<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Error handling with Either, or, Why Either rocks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/</link>
	<description>Technology, mountain biking, politics &#38; music.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Adams</title>
		<link>http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adams.id.au/blog/?p=174#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Sorry Sanj, been over a year since I looked at that code, I'm not really sure :) Must have had a reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Sanj, been over a year since I looked at that code, I&#8217;m not really sure <img src='http://adams.id.au/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Must have had a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanj</title>
		<link>http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>sanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adams.id.au/blog/?p=174#comment-871</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom,

This might be a dumb question, but why not have the methods you call throw a specific RuntimeException as opposed to try/catching it all in one place? That way if the methods pass, you have nothing to do and if they fail, they throw their own context specific Exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom,</p>
<p>This might be a dumb question, but why not have the methods you call throw a specific RuntimeException as opposed to try/catching it all in one place? That way if the methods pass, you have nothing to do and if they fail, they throw their own context specific Exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Annotation</title>
		<link>http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Annotation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adams.id.au/blog/?p=174#comment-200</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by marcohk on 2009-04-10  Error handling with Either, or, Why Either rocks!  http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/ - bookmarked by 4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - bookmarked by 1 members originally found by marcohk on 2009-04-10  Error handling with Either, or, Why Either rocks!  <a href="http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/" rel="nofollow" >http://adams.id.au/blog/2008/08/error-handling-with-either-or-why-either-rocks/</a> - bookmarked by 4 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
